In construction contracts, risk is not the exception, it is part of the project’s very dynamics. What usually distinguishes a project conducted with predictability from one marked by delays, claims, and disputes is not the absence of risk, but how those risks were identified, assessed, and allocated from the outset. For this reason, a risk assessment matrix should not be treated as a mere technical appendix to the contract, but as a central element of contractual governance.
A risk matrix is the instrument that systematically organizes the main events capable of impacting the project. It assesses the probability and impact of such events and, most importantly, defines which party will bear responsibility for each risk. The goal is not simply to list uncertainties, but to allocate them rationally, assigning each risk to the party best positioned, from a technical, operational, or economic standpoint, to manage it.
This work begins even before the contract is signed. Ideally, the risk matrix is developed during the feasibility phase, proposal preparation, and contractual negotiations, alongside the planning of contract administration. At this stage, risk factors are identified and both qualitative and quantitative analyses are conducted. The decisions made here directly affect budgeting, pricing, insurance, guarantees, and the overall project strategy.
After execution begins, the matrix ceases to be a static document and assumes its practical function: guiding risk monitoring throughout performance. Supervening events, technical changes, external interferences, or contextual shifts are analyzed based on what was previously agreed upon. This helps reduce debates over merit, responsibility, and financial impact.
In practice, the matrix should be consulted whenever a relevant event arises. The project manager evaluates the likelihood of occurrence, the potential impact, and the contractual consequences. From there, it is assessed whether the risk is insurable, transferable, or residual, which mitigation measures are appropriate, and who is responsible for implementing them. Even in smaller projects, a simplified matrix, such as a 3×3 model based on probability and impact, can significantly improve decision-making.
The benefits of a well-structured risk matrix are clear. It enhances planning from the outset, prevents a false sense of security, reduces information asymmetries, and increases contractual predictability. It also plays a key role in preventing and managing claims. When risks are clearly allocated, discussions tend to become more objective, facilitating dialogue and reducing the likelihood of escalation into formal disputes.
From an economic perspective, the matrix directly influences contract pricing. Excessively or arbitrarily assigning risks to the contractor often inflates prices, reduces competitiveness, and discourages qualified market players. A more balanced allocation, on the other hand, promotes more realistic proposals and more sustainable contractual relationships.
Finally, it is important to emphasize that a risk matrix will only deliver results if properly implemented. Its effectiveness depends on aligned technical and legal teams who are trained and committed to using it as an active management tool—not as a formal document that loses relevance after contract signing. In complex contracts, particularly in construction, this level of maturity often determines whether risks are managed proactively or disputes ultimately become inevitable.
In the end, a risk matrix does not eliminate risk, it organizes it. And successful contracts are not those that never face unforeseen events, but those in which it is clear who bears each risk and how it will be addressed.
JOBIM, Jorge Pinheiro; RICARDINO, Roberto. Panorama da Administração Contratual em Obras e Serviços de Infraestrutura. In: ROSA, Beatriz Vidigal Xavier da Silveira (coord.). Cadernos Técnicos do IBDIC: Administração de Contratos. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito da Construção, 2022. P. 12 – 23.
DABUS, André. Melhores práticas para contratação de seguros e garantias em projetos de engenharia e construção. In: ROSA, Beatriz Vidigal Xavier da Silveira (coord.). Cadernos Técnicos do IBDIC: Administração de Contratos. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito da Construção, 2022. P. 53 – 68.
BAHIA, Beatriz Filgueiras; SHIBATA, Karine Cotelesse Monteiro. Gestão de contratos em obras de engenharia para empresas de micro e pequeno porte. In: SHIBATA, Karine Cotelesse Monteiro (coord.). Cadernos Técnicos do IBDIC: Obras de Pequeno Porte e Pequenas e Médias Empresas, 2022. P. 81 – 109.
Tribunal de Contas da União (TCU). Indicador de Percepção de Maturidade de Projetos: Guia Prático para Aplicação. Brasília: Tribunal de Contas da União, 2025.
FILHO, Paulo Carvalho do Nascimento. Dispute Board e a sua eficiência na prevenção e resolução de litígios. In: MACEDO, Adriano Gonçalves et al. (org.). Pareceres de Engenharia: Administração Contratual e Riscos. São Paulo: Associação para o Desenvolvimento de Engenharia de Custos, 2023. P. 132 – 146.
ROCHA; Luiz Carlos Campoy da. Controle de Custo na Obra – Autópsia x Prevenção. In: ALVES, Filipe Bonaldo et al. (coord.). Pareceres de Engenharia: Gestão de Contratos e Pleitos. São Paulo: Associação para o Desenvolvimento de Engenharia de Custos, 2016. P. 79 – 84.
BRASIL. Ministério do Planejamento, Desenvolvimento e Gestão. Matriz de Riscos. Assessoria Especial de Controle Interno (AECI), 2017.
BRASIL. Tribunal de Contas da União. Licitações & Contratos: Orientações e Jurisprudência do TCU / Tribunal de Contas da União. 5a Edição, Brasília: TCU, Secretaria-Geral da Presidência, 2024.
ROSA, Beatriz Vidigal Xavier da Silveira (coord.). ROSA, Luís Otávio Pasquale e USHIRO LEIRI, Marlon Shigueru. Caderno Técnico: A administração contratual durante a execução do contrato. In: Cadernos Técnicos do IBDIC: Administração de Contratos. Instituto Brasileiro de Direito da Construção, 2022.
